Embedded Linux board support
Assess embedded Linux board support in the context of kernel drivers and USB, including implementation choices, quality checks, operational constraints and ownership during real delivery.
/ Engineering service
Combine device interfaces, operating systems, C/C++ and production testing for reliable connected and industrial software.
Technical scope
Every engagement is scoped against real technologies, existing systems and measurable responsibilities.
Assess embedded Linux board support in the context of kernel drivers and USB, including implementation choices, quality checks, operational constraints and ownership during real delivery.
Assess kernel drivers and USB in the context of RTOS system design, including implementation choices, quality checks, operational constraints and ownership during real delivery.
Assess RTOS system design in the context of C and C++ reliability, including implementation choices, quality checks, operational constraints and ownership during real delivery.
Assess C and C++ reliability in the context of protocol and hardware interfaces, including implementation choices, quality checks, operational constraints and ownership during real delivery.
Assess protocol and hardware interfaces in the context of test automation on devices, including implementation choices, quality checks, operational constraints and ownership during real delivery.
Assess test automation on devices in the context of embedded Linux board support, including implementation choices, quality checks, operational constraints and ownership during real delivery.
/ Engineering situations
Engineering challenges we can help you tackle.
01 / 04
Consider this situation: Port firmware to a new board. Clarify the current system, dependencies and delivery boundaries, then agree on what success and operational validation would look like.
02 / 04
Consider this situation: Debug intermittent USB connectivity. Clarify the current system, dependencies and delivery boundaries, then agree on what success and operational validation would look like.
03 / 04
Consider this situation: Design a Linux driver integration. Clarify the current system, dependencies and delivery boundaries, then agree on what success and operational validation would look like.
04 / 04
Consider this situation: Stabilize real-time device operations. Clarify the current system, dependencies and delivery boundaries, then agree on what success and operational validation would look like.
How we approach the work
Combine device interfaces, operating systems, C/C++ and production testing for reliable connected and industrial software.
Map architecture, environments, business priorities, decision owners and current risks.
Agree architecture choices, integrations, engineering responsibilities, test evidence and review cadence.
Deliver in reviewable increments with appropriate security, QA, performance and release checks.
Use feedback from production, users and the engineering team to improve the system deliberately.
Questions about the engagement
Scope depends on the existing architecture, integrations, release constraints and the outcome you want. We first clarify boundaries, risks and technical responsibilities.
Yes. A focused specialist or a cross-functional engineering group may make sense depending on the workload and ownership required. We confirm the model for each engagement.
We look for evidence in real code, system decisions, failure analysis, tests, deployment practices and the responsibilities the engineer has personally owned.
Share the current system, intended changes, relevant stack, timeline and how your team works. We can then propose a practical discussion and next steps.
/ Engineering service
Engineering support shaped around your systems, priorities and delivery needs.
/ Client recognition
Independent feedback from the teams we've worked with.
“Onectus technologies showcased their expertise, professionalism, and commitment to delivering a high-quality solution.”
CEO, Furnistudio.com
Furniture configurator & commerce
“We liked the flexibility of their developers.”
CTO, FinTech Company
Fintech product engineering
“Put simply, they were perfect.”
Head of Software Engineering, Social Shopping Group
Global shopping platforms